NSW Caselaw
CITATION: D -v- Berkeley Challenge Pty Ltd [2001] NSWADT 92 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Mrs D RESPONDENT Berkeley Challenge Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: 991072 HEARING DATES: 07/03/2001, 08/03/2001 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 03/08/2001 DATE OF DECISION: 06/05/2001
BEFORE: Britton A - Judicial Member; Nemeth de Bikal L - Member; Strickland J - Member APPLICATION: Sexual Harassment - In workplace - Victimisation MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal Matter LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Shellharbour Golf Course v Wheeler [1999] NSWSC 224 University of New South Wales v Moorhouse (1974-75)133 CLR 1 Falcon v Famous Players Film Co. [1926] 2 KB 474 Shaikh v Commissioner, NSW Fire Brigades (1996) EOC 92-808 Adelaide Corporation v Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd (1928) 40 CLR 481 CASES CITED: Lal v President, Anti-Discrimination Board of New South Wales [2000] NSWADT 68 Crewdson -v- President, Anti-Discrimination Board of New South Wales [2000] NSWADT 60 Sivananthan v Commissioner of Police, New South Police Service [2001] NSWADT 44 O' Callaghan v Loder [1984] EOC 92-023 Reddrop v Boeringer Ingleheim Pty Ltd [1984] EOC 92-031 Waterhouse v Bell (1991) 25 NSWLR 99 Hall v Sheiban (1985) ALR 503 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: P Newell, barrister RESPONDENT M Diamond, solicitor ORDERS: 1. That the respondent pay the complainant within twenty-one days of the date of this decision the sum of $26,800.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate