NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel
CITATION: Law Society of New South Wales -v- Young (No 3) (LSD) [2001] NSWADTAP 38 APPELLANT PARTIES: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales RESPONDENT Lesley McIntosh Young FILE NUMBER: 999021 HEARING DATES: 03/04/2001, 14/06/2001, 19/06/2001 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 06/19/2001 DATE OF DECISION: 11/23/2001
Law Society of New South Wales -v- Young [1999] NSWADT 78 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: O'Connor K - DCJ (President); Robinson WL QC -Judicial Member; Elliott K - Member CATCHWORDS: no evidence - relevant/irrelevant considerations - unreasonableness MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 982002 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 09/03/1999 LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Legal Profession Act 1987 Barwick v Law Society of New South Wales [2000] HCA 2 Law Society of New South Wales v Young (No 2) [2001] NSWADTAP 19 Ex p Tziniolis: re the Medical Practitioners Act (1966) 67 SR (NSW) 448 Law Society of New South Wales v Harvey [1976] 2 NSWLR 154 Law Society of New South Wales v Moulton [1981] 2 NSWLR 736 Burton v Anderson NSWCA (Kirby P, Priestley, Handley JJA) unreported, 28 September 1994 Law Society v Foreman (1994) 34 NSWLR 408 CASES CITED: R v A and B [1999] NSWADTAP 2 Woodside v Director General, Department of Community Services [2000] NSWADTAP 8 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte P T [2001] HCA 20 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1987) 14 ALD 291 Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (Fed Ct FC) (1998) 160 ALR 24 Weal v Bathurst City Council & anor [2000] NSWCA 88 APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: J Griffiths, barrister RESPONDENT P Capelin QC, barrister ORDERS: 1. Appeal dismissed as it relates to Penalty Orders 1, 2 and 3; 2. In relation to Penalty Order 4 of the Tribunal, Appeal Panel to reconvene to hear submissions on the practicality of the Order, and whether a substitute Order should be made, or the Order vacated.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate