NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union -v- Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2002] NSWADT 263 DIVISION: Revenue Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union RESPONDENT Chief Commissioner of State Revenue FILE NUMBER: 026004 HEARING DATES: 11/06/2002 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 07/12/2002 DATE OF DECISION: 12/13/2002
BEFORE: Verick A - Judicial Member APPLICATION: Pay-roll tax - charitable society or institution MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter Pay-roll Tax Act 1971 LEGISLATION CITED : Taxation Administration Act 1996 Statute of Elizabeth 43, Ch4 (1601) Incorporated Council of Law reporting (QLD) v FC of T (1971) 125 CLR 659 AG New South Wales v Sawtell (1978) 2 NSWWLR 200 Mayor of Manchester v MacAdam (1896) 3 TC 492 Australian College of Surgeons v The Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1943] 68 CLR 436 Attorney General and Sawtell (1978) 2 NSWLR 200 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Ross v Costigan (1982) FLR 184; 41 ALR 319 CASES CITED: Chesterman v FC of T (1923) 37 CLR 317 Special Purposes of Income Tax v Pemsel (Pemsel's Case) [1891] A.C. 531 Incorporated Council of Law Reporting v FC of T (1971) 125 CLR 659 Stratton v Simpson (1970) 125 CLR 138 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons v FC of T(1943) 68 CLR 436 Thompson v. FC of T (1959) 102 CLR 315 Barclay v. Treasurer of Queensland (1996) 2 QdR 112 Property Security Industry Training Advisory Board v FC of T 1999 ATC 2076 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: R Hamilton, barrister RESPONDENT P Gormly, barrister ORDERS: 1. That the Chief Commissioner erred in considering his view in relation to paragraph (j) of ss10 as a reviewable decision; 2. That the decision of the Chief Commissioner in relation to paragraph (k) of ss10 the subject of this review be affirmed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate