NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Testoni -v- Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2003] NSWADT 29 DIVISION: General Division APPLICANT PARTIES: John Anthony Testoni RESPONDENT Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service FILE NUMBER: 013296 HEARING DATES: 08/03/2002, 26/04/2002 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 08/16/2002 DATE OF DECISION: 02/17/2003
BEFORE: Lees M - Judicial Member APPLICATION: Security Industry Act - security industry licence - revocation or suspension of licence - Security industry licence - revocation or suspension of licence MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Security Industry Act 1997 Security Industry Regulation 1998 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Bourke & Ors v The New South Wales Commissioner of Police [1998] NSWADT 1 Hargreaves v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [1999] NSWADT 64 Winika v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSW ADT 8 CASES CITED: Maha Pese v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSW ADT 67 Sobey v Commercial Private Agent's Board [1979] 22 SASR 70 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (1953) 93 CLR 127 Joyce -v- Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service (GD) [2000] NSWADTAP 17 Sobey v Commercial Private Agents Board (1979) 22 SASR 70 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond and Ors (1990) 170 CLR 321 APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT 08/03/2002: C Dawes, Solicitor 26/04/2002: P Sternberg, Barrister ORDERS: The Commissioner's decision to revoke Mr Testoni's security industry licence based first on s. 26(1)(a) and second on s. 26(1)(c) of the Security Industry Act, is set aside.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate