NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: Ferns v NSW Department of Corrective Services (GD) [2008] NSWADTAP 37 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the decision for a list of the amendments.
APPELLANT Helen Ferns PARTIES: RESPONDENT NSW Department of Corrective Services
FILE NUMBER: 089004
HEARING DATES: 13 June 2008
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 13 June 2008
DATE OF DECISION: 13 June 2008
BEFORE: O'Connor K - DCJ (President); Fitzgerald K - Judicial Member; Blake C - Non Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Order by consent
MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter
DECISION UNDER APPEAL: Ferns v NSW Department of Corrective Services [2007] NSWADT 293
FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 073112
DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 12/13/2007
LEGISLATION CITED : Freedom of Information Act 1989
CASES CITED: N/A
APPELLANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT T Anderson, barrister
Order by consent: ORDERS: (a) That the words 'in excess of 60' be replaced by the word '38' in the letter of Acting Commissioner Luke Grant to the NSW Ombudsman dated 24 January 2007 (b) A notation to be inserted alongside the amendment identified in paragraph (a) above on all paper copies of the document and as a footnote on electronic copies stating that the ADT Appeal Panel has ordered the amendment as it was found to be incorrect and misleading (c) A copy of the amended document to be forwarded to the NSW Ombudsman within 28 days and a copy of that correspondence to be provided to the Appellant at the same time.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate