NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Cianfrano v Director-General, Premier's Department NSW & anor [2004] NSWADT 255 revised - 17/12/2004 DIVISION: General Division APPLICANT Robert Cianfrano PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT Director-General, Premier's Department NSW SECOND RESPONDENT Sydney Markets Limited FILE NUMBER: 033268 HEARING DATES: 19/05/2004 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 05/19/2004 DATE OF DECISION: 11/09/2004
BEFORE: Higgins S - Judicial Member APPLICATION: access to documents - business affairs - access to documents - cabinet documents - access to documents - Executive Council documents - access to documents - internal working documents - access to documents - legal professional privilege - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - business affairs - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - cabinet documents - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - Executive Council documents - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - internal working documents - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - legal professional privilege MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Freedom of Information Act 1989 Bennett v The Vice Chancellor, University of New England [2002] NSWADT 8 Daniels Corp International Pty Limited v Australia Competition & Consumer Commissioner (2002) 213 CLR 543 Director-General Department of Community Services v Latham [2000] NSWADTAP 21 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 Hynes v General Manager, Hawkesbury City Council [2004] NSWADT 135 CASES CITED: Law Society of New South Wales v General Manager, Workcover Authority of New South Wales (GD) [2004] NSWADT 40 Preston v Chief Executive, Casino Control Authority; Star City Pty Limited & TABCORP Holdings Ltd v Chief Executive, Casino Control Authority [2003] NSWADT 165 at [50] Re Ecclestone and Department of Family Service and Aboriginal and Islander Affairs (1993) 1 QAR 60 Re Murtagh and Commissioner of Taxation (1984) 6 ALD 112 at 123 Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244 Waterford v Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54 Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: FIRST RESPONDENT M Allars, counsel SECOND RESPONDENT R Davis, solicitor ORDERS: (1) The decision of the Director-General in respect of the following documents is affirmed: ; File SPD/03648, Part 36:; Document No. 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 25; File SPD/03648 Part 35: Document No 1; File SMA Taskforce 2002 314:; Document No 7 (except the Deed), 11 (except the Deed and the emails dated 20/06/02 and 21/06/02), 17 (except letter, dated 12/06/02, from Anderson to Sakaris and letter, dated 7/06/02, from Friedeberg to Anderson), 19 (except letter, dated 5/06/02, from Friedberg to Anderson), 22, 24, 25 (except Deed), 26, 27, 28, 30 (except Special Conditions), 33 (except Special Conditions), 34, 35, 37, 39, 40 and 41; (2) The decision of the Director-General in respect of the following documents is set aside and in substitution thereof a decision that Mr Cianfrano be given access to these documents:; File SPD/03648 Part 36; 3, 18, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28 ; File SMA Taskforce 2002 314:; DocumentNo 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 (emails dated 20 & 21/06/02 only), 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 (letter dated 12/06/02 from Anderson to Sakaris and letter dated 7/06/02, from Friedeberg to Anderson only), 18, 19 (letter dated 5/06/02 from Friedberg to Anderson only), 20, 21, 22 (Deed only), 31 (paragraphs one and two only) and 38 ; (3) The decision of the Director-General in respect of the following documents be set aside and remitted for reconsideration in accordance with this decision pursuant to s. 63(3)(d) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997: ; SM Taskforce 2002 314 file; Document 7 (the Deed only), 11 (the Deed only), 25 (the Deed only), 30 (the special conditions only), 31 (the paragraphs following the second paragraph only), 33 (the special conditions only).; (4) Mr Cianfrano be provided with a copy of Document No 25 in File SPD/03648, Part 36 with the exempt material deleted.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate