NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Tribe v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2006] NSWADT 63
DIVISION: Revenue Division
APPLICANT PARTIES: Brett Martin Tribe RESPONDENT Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
FILE NUMBER: 056076
HEARING DATES: 18/10/2005
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 10/18/2005
DATE OF DECISION: 03/07/2006
BEFORE: Hole M - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Duties Act - First Home Plus Scheme - residence requirement - Duties Act - First Home Plus Scheme- eligible agreements or transfers
MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter
LEGISLATION CITED : Duties Act 1997 First Home Owner Grant Act 2000
Calcaro v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2004] NSW ADT 158 Mawad v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] NSWADT 207 McKenzie v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2005] NSWADT 214 CASES CITED: Scurry v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2006] NSW ADT 29 Snow v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 2) [2005] NSW ADT 278 Tarak Adasi v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (unreported) Taylor v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2004] NSWADT 36 Tribe v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2006] NSWADT 62
APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT S Free, Solicitor
ORDERS: 1. The decision of the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue to recall the First Home Plus concession is affirmed together with the imposition of market rate interest
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate