NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Miedzinski v Council of the Law Society of NSW [2007] NSWADT 268
DIVISION: Legal Services Division
APPLICANT Helen Anne Miedzinski PARTIES: RESPONDENT Council of the Law Society of New South Wales
FILE NUMBER: 062029
HEARING DATES: 3 May 2007
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 3 May 2007
DATE OF DECISION: 20 November 2007
BEFORE: Karpin A - ADCJ (Deputy President)
CATCHWORDS: Review – decision to refuse application for approval of lay associate (section 17(4))
MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 Legal Profession Act 2004
Barwick v. Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2004] NSWCA 32 CASES CITED: Camille Edouard Dezarnaulds & Stephen Wawn v. The Law Society of New South Wales [unreported 27 June 1995] Court of Appeal NSW La Fontaine & Anor v. Law Society of NSW [2006] NSWADT 244
J Shaw QC REPRESENTATION: D Barton, solicitor
ORDERS: 1. Pursuant to s. 17 Legal Profession Act 2004, the Tribunal approves the employment of Ross Garfield Barwick in the practice of the applicant upon the following conditions:; A. Mr. Barwick's employment to be limited to:; i. Drafting deeds, documents, letters, contracts, special conditions, wills and all documents and correspondence associated with the practice of law, including correspondence relating to outstanding costs and disbursements; ii. Research for professional staff; iii. Preparation of briefs to Counsel, observations for Counsel, drafting documents and written submissions to be settled by Counsel; B. Conditions of employment:; i. Mr. Barwick to be supervised by Helen Anne Miedzinski at all times.; ii. Mr. Barwick is not to have access to or be signatory to any account conducted by the applicant with any financial institution in the course of her practice.; iii. No document, letter or any other written material drafted by Mr. Barwick is to be despatched from the applicant's office without prior approval of the applicant.; iv. No document or written communication of any nature is to leave the practice under the name or signature of Mr. Barwick; v. Mr. Barwick may not have a business card that identifies him with the applicant's practice without prior approval of the Law Society of NSW; vi. Mr. Barwick may only attend upon clients if: (a) the client has been advised by the applicant that Mr. Barwick is not a qualified legal practitioner; (b) the attendance is conducted in the presence of a qualified member of the applicant's staff who has carriage of the particular matter; vii. Mr. Barwick may not appear in court to instruct counsel, nor seek leave to appear in a matter for mention or otherwise; C. The Tribunal notes that the applicant will impose the following conditions on Mr. Barwick:; i. To attend the office daily; ii. To attend continuing legal education seminars as required by the applicant.; iii. To complete time sheets; 2. Each party to pay their own costs of and incidental to these proceedings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate