NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: Howe v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (GD) [2004] NSWADTAP 2 APPELLANT PARTIES: Peter Allan Howe RESPONDENT Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee FILE NUMBER: 039033 HEARING DATES: 21/10/2003 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 12/18/2003 DATE OF DECISION: 02/09/2004
Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Howe [2002] NSWADT 191 & Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Howe (No 2) [2003] NSWADT 156 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Nader J QC - ADCJ (Deputy President); Montgomery S - Judicial Member; McGilvray G - Member CATCHWORDS: admissibility of evidence - evidence - fresh evidence - expert witness - objectivity of - leave to extend to the merits - opportunity to be heard - penalty MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 023033 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 05/13/2003 LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Veterinary Surgeons Act 1986 Bunning v. Cross (1977-8) 141 CLR 54 CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 CASES CITED: Council of City of Greater Wollongong v Cowan (1954) 93CLR 435 Hall v New South Wales Trotting Club Limited [1977] 1 NSWLR 378 Howe v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of NSW & ors [2003] NSWSC 157 APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: A Stenmark SC, counsel RESPONDENT M Wade, solicitor ORDERS: Appeal dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate