NSW Caselaw
CITATION: JA v State of New South Wales (New South Wales Police) (No 2) [2004] NSWADT 76 revised - 21/04/2004 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division APPLICANT PARTIES: JA RESPONDENT State of New South Wales (New South Wales Police) FILE NUMBER: 021075 HEARING DATES: 2/04/2004 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 04/07/2004 DATE OF DECISION: 04/19/2004
BEFORE: Hennessy N - Magistrate (Deputy President); McDonald O - Non Judicial Member; Mooney L - Non Judicial Member APPLICATION: summons - access to documents produced MATTER FOR DECISION: Preliminary matter Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Freedom of Information Act 1989 Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 404 Attorney General for New South Wales v Stuart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667 CASES CITED: Burmah Oil Co v Bank of England [1980] AC 1090 National Employers' Mutual General v Waind and Hill [1978] 1 NSWLR 372 R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14 Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: In person RESPONDENT H Bell, solicitor ORDERS: 1. In relation to all the documents to which JA has been given access, but with some text deleted, JA is to be given photocopy access to a full copy of each of those documents.; 2. JA to be given photocopy access to the hand written notes of an interview with Todd Blanch. ; 3. JA to be given photocopy access to the "traced call" documents with the names and addresses of the people identified in those documents deleted.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate