NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Tredinnick -v- Wentworth Area Health Service [2000] NSWADT 172 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division APPLICANT Gregory Alan Tredinnick PARTIES: RESPONDENT Wentworth Area Health Service FILE NUMBER: 991069 HEARING DATES: 05/07/2000 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 07/05/2000 DATE OF DECISION: 11/23/2000
BEFORE: Goode P - Judicial Member; McDonald O - Member; Luger M - Member APPLICATION: Dismissal of complaint - frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance MATTER FOR DECISION: Preliminary matter LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Langley v Niland & Anor (1981) 2 NSWLR 104 Hill v University of New England (1990) EOC 92 – 291 Wensley v Technical and Further Education Commission [2000] NSWADT 142 Assal v Department of Health Housing and Community Services (1992) EOC 92-409 CASES CITED: State Electricity Commission of Victoria v Rabel & Ors (1998) 1VR 102 Reyes-Gonzalez v Sydney Institute of Technology (1998) NSWEOT (6 March 1998) Prakash v Bobb Borg Enterprises Pty Ltd [1999] NSWADT 73 Khan v Macquarie University and Webster [1999] NSW ADT 100 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) 1964 112 CLR 125 Tannock v State of New South Wales [1999] NSWADT 31 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: G Raffell, barrister RESPONDENT J Murphy, barrister ORDERS: The Respondent's application is dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate