Appeal Panel - Internal CITATION: Abdul-Karim v New South Wales Bar Association (LSD) [2004] NSWADTAP 5 APPELLANT PARTIES: Michael Saadey Abdul-Karim RESPONDENT The Council of the New South Wales Bar Association FILE NUMBER: 039051 HEARING DATES: 26/11/2003 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 11/26/2003 DATE OF DECISION: 02/17/2004 New South Wales Bar Association v Abdul-Karim [2003] NSWADT 60, New South Wales Bar Association v Abdul-Karim (No 2) [2003] NSWADT 144 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Nader J QC - ADCJ (Deputy President); Macfarlan R QC - Judicial Member; Bubniuk L - Member CATCHWORDS: leave to withdraw appeal MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 012029 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 06/17/2003 LEGISLATION CITED : CASES CITED: APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: R Wilson, barrister RESPONDENT P Mahony, barrister ORDERS: 1. That the Appellant be granted leave to withdraw his Notice of Appeal.; 2. The Appellant pay the Respondent's costs of the appeal. 1 By his Notice of Appeal dated 10 July 2003 and filed on 11 July 2003, the Appellant sought the setting aside of findings of the Tribunal contained in its decision of 27 March 2003 and, on the question of penalty, of 17 June 2003. 2 On 26 November 2003, the Appellant sought leave to withdraw his appeal. This was opposed by the Respondent upon the basis that the withdrawal would deprive the Respondent of the opportunity to seek the substituted orders set out in its Reply filed on 15 August 2003. 3 By adopting the course of seeking substituted orders in its Reply, the Respondent assumed the risk that the opportunity to seek those substituted orders might be lost if the appeal were not pursued. It was open to the Respondent to take the alternative course of lodging an appeal itself. 4 In the circumstances, we do not see any reason why leave should not be given to the Appellant to withdraw his appeal, on the basis that he pay the costs thus far incurred by the Respondent in respect of the appeal. DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.