NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Hanna v Saracoglu [2005] NSWADT 227 DIVISION: Retail Leases Division APPLICANTS Anthony Hanna PARTIES: Allan Hanna RESPONDENTS Tekin Saracoglu Hatice Saracoglu FILE NUMBER: 055103 HEARING DATES: 28/09/2005 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 28/09/2005 DATE OF DECISION: 07/10/2005
BEFORE: Fox R - Judicial Member APPLICATION: Claim for declaration of rights, obligations and liabilities under a lease - Claim for the doing of work or provision of services MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Retail Leases Act 1994 CASES CITED: REPRESENTATION: In person In person ORDERS: I make the following Orders, pursuant to S72 1(f) (iii), (c)(i), (2), (3), and (4); 1. Option validly exercised, term ends 7 November 2007; 2. Rent applicable from 8 November 2004 is $2,206.67 per month (plus GST if lessor has ABN) until market valuation process is completed, note that neither party has yet nominated a Valuer in accordance with clause 9 (4) (e) of Lease; 3. Premises include garage at rear of shop; 4. Lessee not liable to pay water rates until separate water meter installed at Lessors' cost; 5. Lessee must carry out further roof repairs by 30 November 2005; 6. Lessor to establish by 30 November 2005 to satisfaction of Lessees, that bond of $4,827.55 is held in interest bearing deposit on Lessees' behalf ; 7. Matter listed for further Directions 8 December 2005 at 3.15 pm, but only in relation to Orders 5 and 6 above; 8. The parties were not represented, no Order for costs is appropriate.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate