NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Carle -v- Penrith Rugby League Club Limited [2001] NSWADT 29 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Marie Carle RESPONDENT Penrith Rugby League Club Limited FILE NUMBER: 001020 12/12/2000 HEARING DATES: 13/12/2000 14/12/2000 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 12/14/2000 DATE OF DECISION: 02/21/2001
BEFORE: Bartley R - Judicial Member; Silva A - Member; Mooney L - Member APPLICATION: Disability Discrimination - In work - Victimisation MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 CASES CITED: APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: A Britt, barrister RESPONDENT J Murphy, barrister ORDERS: 1. The Tribunal directs the Respondent to pay to the Applicant the sum of $10,274.00 by way of compensation; 2. No order as to costs.
Reasons for Decision
1 The Complainant commenced employment as a casual security officer at the Penrith Rugby Leagues Club in October 1989.
2 On 5.11.97 she lodged a complaint of disability Discrimination with the Anti-Discrimination Board against the Respondent claiming that she had been refused a permanent part-time security officer's position on the basis of the fact she had asthma.
3 On 16 December 1997 the Board received a further complaint in which the complainant stated her hours of work as a casual security officer with the Respondent had been reduced after she had complained about not getting the permanent part time security officer position.
4 On 28 June 1999 she made a further complaint of disability discrimination in which she said she was told to wear an earpiece at work or she would be taken off security work even though she had a medical certificate stating that she could not wear an earpiece due to recurrent ear inflammation.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate