NSW Caselaw
Set aside by Appeal : Set aside by consent on 26/6/2000
CITATION: Raethel -v- Director Geneneral, Department of Education and Training [2000] NSWADT 14 DIVISION: General Division APPLICANT Stephanie Raethel PARTIES: RESPONDENT Director General, Department of Education and Training FILE NUMBER: 993051 HEARING DATES: 10/11/99 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 11/10/1999 DATE OF DECISION: 02/25/2000
BEFORE: O'Connor K - DCJ (President) APPLICATION: access to documents - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Freedom of Information Act 1989 CASES CITED: APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: R Lancaster, barrister RESPONDENT P Singleton, barrister ORDERS: 1 The decision under review is affirmed in respect of release of information relating to postcode areas where there is only one school; 2 The decision under review is otherwise set aside, and the following decision is made in substitution: That the applicant's request be granted in relation to information organised by reference to postcode area in the case of each postcode area that has two or more schools; 3 Any application for an order for costs in this matter and in matter No 993052 is reserved for hearing at a date to be fixed ; NOTE: The above Orders, made on 25/02/2000 were set aside, by consent on Appeal. There was no hearing before the Appeal Panel. (See Director General, Department of Education and Training -v- Raethel [2000] NSWADTAP 11 for orders made in substitution on 26/06/2000.)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate