NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (Discriplinary Order: Inquiries 1 ('Chisel'), 2 ('Gypsy') and 3 ('Remus')) (No 2) (GD) [2005] NSWADTAP 15 APPELLANT PARTIES: Ronald George Lloyd RESPONDENT Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee FILE NUMBER: 049044 HEARING DATES: On the papers SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 04/13/2005 DATE OF DECISION: 04/20/2005
Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd (Disciplinary Order: Inquiries 1 ('Chisel'), 2 ('Gypsy') and 3 ('Remus')) [2004] NSWADT 208 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Goode P - Judicial Member; Carter T - Non Judicial Member CATCHWORDS: costs MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 40004, 40005 and 40015 of 1998 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 09/22/2004 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 Veterinary Surgeons Act 1986 Brooks Maher v Cheung [2001] NSWADT 18 Burton v Anderson, unreported, Court of Appeal (CA 40030/92), 28 October 1994 Charteris v General Manager, Leichhardt Municipal Council (No 2) (GD) [2001] NSWADTAP 39 Citadin Pty Ltd (No 20) v Eddie Azzi Australia Pty Ltd & General Pants Co Pty Ltd (RLD) [2001] NSWADTAP 31 Di Suvero v New South Wales Bar Association (LSD) [2001] NSWADTAP 37 CASES CITED: DO v University of New South Wales (GD) [2003] NSWADTAP 9 French v Sydney Turf Club Ltd (No 2) (EOD) [2003] NSWADTAP 54 Gelderman v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (GD) [2001] NSWADTAP 27 Howe v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (No 2) (GD) [2005] NSWADTAP 4 Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (Disciplinary Order: Inquiries 1 ('Chisel'), 2 ('Gypsy') and 3 ('Remus')) (GD) [2005] NSWADTAP 2 New South Wales Bar Association v Tedeschi (No 3) [2003] NSWADT 174 Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd (Disciplinary Order: Inquiries 1 ('Chisel'), 2 ('Gypsy') and 3 ('Remus')) [2004] NSWADT 208 APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: B Green, solicitor RESPONDENT M Wade, solicitor ORDERS: 1. The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed, excluding costs relating to the Appellant's application for an urgent stay heard on 25 October 2004; 2. There will be no order for costs on this application by the Respondent.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate