NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Rolet -v- Baron [2002] NSWADT 136 DIVISION: Retail Leases Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Eddy Sylvian Marcel Rolet t/a Survivors of Child Abuse-Supporters Survivors RESPONDENT Ken Baron FILE NUMBER: 015102 HEARING DATES: 21/06/02 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 06/21/2002 DATE OF DECISION: 08/09/2002
BEFORE: Fox R - Judicial Member APPLICATION: Claim for payment of money MATTER FOR DECISION: Jurisdiction LEGISLATION CITED : Retail Leases Act 1994 CASES CITED: Cathay Developments Pty Ltd v. Laser Entertainment Pty Ltd Matter No 4697/97 [1998] NSWSC 82 (25 March 1998) APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT G Gordon, solicitor INTERVENER K Carlsund, registrar of Retail Tenancies Unit ORDERS: 1. Application dismissed - no jurisdiction - Section 6 (1)(a) Retail Leases Act.; 2. No order for costs.
1 The hearing in these proceedings was limited to the question of jurisdiction, it being apparent that Section 6 (1)(a) might well apply to place the letting outside of the ambit of the Act. 2 Mr Rolet appeared for himself, and Mr Baron was represented by Mr Gordon, Solicitor of E H Tebbutt and Sons. 3 The Registrar of Retail Tenancy Units intervened pursuant to Section 65(2) 4 I had before me affidavit evidence from Mr Rolet and Mr Baron, and both gave oral evidence and were subject to cross-examination. 5 I am satisfied that both Mr Rolet and Mr Baron are witnesses of truth, and I accept their evidence as honestly given. 6 There was no controversy about the term of the tenancy, it commenced on 18 April 2000 and was terminated by lock out on 22 December 2000. 7 In order to place to whole matter in context it is appropriate to first observe that there was a dispute in relation to a payment to $400.00 alleged to have been made around 18 April 2000, but there was no dispute in relation to subsequent payments of rent at a rental of $100.00 per week as follows:- Date Of Payment Amount Date Paid To 4 August 2000 $200.00 18 August 2000 18 August 2000 $200.00 1 September 2000 1 September 2000 $400.00 14 September 2000 15 September 2000 $200.00 29 September 2000 6 October 2000 $200.00 13 October 2000 13 October 2000 $200.00 27 October 2000 30 October 2000 $200.00 10 November 2000 16 November 2000 $200.00 24 November 2000 27 November 2000 $200.00 8 December 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate