NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Barsoum -v- Glebe Administration Board [2002] NSWADT 19 DIVISION: Retail Leases Division APPLICANT Samy Barsoum PARTIES: RESPONDENT Glebe Administration Board
FILE NUMBER: 015041 HEARING DATES: 12/11/2001, 13/11/2001, 14/11/2001 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 11/14/2001 DATE OF DECISION: 02/18/2002
BEFORE: Molloy GB - Judicial Member APPLICATION: Claim for payment of money MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Retail Leases Act 1994 Manton -v- Parabolic Pty Limited (1985) 2 NSWLR 361 J C Berndt Pty Limited -v- Walsh (1969) SASR 34 Aussie Traveller Pty Limited -v- Marklea Pty Limited (1998) 1 Qd.R 1 CASES CITED: Spyer -v- Phillipson (1931) 2 Ch 183 North Shore Gas Company Ltd -v- Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) (1940) 63CLR 52 Bain -v- Brand (1976) 1 App Cas 762 Melluish -v- B.M.I. No. 3 Limited (1996) 1 AC 454 Gizah Pty Limited -v- AXA Trustees Limited (No. 2) (2001) NSW ADT 164 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: J Gooley, barrister RESPONDENT D Flaherty, barrister ORDERS: 1. Application dismissed; 2. Leave granted to the Respondent to re-list this matter before me within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order to argue whether the Applicant should pay the costs of the Respondent of the whole matter, or any part of the matter. Should the Respondent re-list to argue this issue then such argument will be limited to that issue the subject of the re-listing. In the event that the Respondent does not re-list for argument then there will be no order as to costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate