NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Dunstan v Commissioner, Department of Corrective Services [2004] NSWADT 177 revised - 7/09/2004 DIVISION: General Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Colin Dunstan RESPONDENT Commissioner, Department of Corrective Services FILE NUMBER: 043022 HEARING DATES: 8/06/2004 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 08/10/2004 DATE OF DECISION: 08/20/2004
BEFORE: O'Connor K - DCJ (President) APPLICATION: access to documents - law enforcement & public safety - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - law enforcement & public safety MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 Freedom of Information Act 1989 Attorney-General's Department v Cockcroft (1986) 64 ALR 97 Centrelink v Dykstra [2002] FCA 1442 CASES CITED: Commissioner of Police v District Court of New South Wales (Perrin's case) (1993) 31 NSWLR 606 Dunstan v The Queen [2001] FCA 147 FA v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police (GD) [2004] NSWADTAP 7 Queen v Colin George Dunstan [2000] ACTSC 35 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: In person RESPONDENT E Ball, solicitor ORDERS: 1. The respondent's determination is varied. ; 2. The agency is to disclose the passages from Documents 7, 8, 12(c), 12(b), 12(a), 12 and 13 as identified in the Confidential Appendix to the Reasons. ; 3. Order 2 to take effect after 28 days from the date of delivery of these reasons.; 4. Liberty to the respondent to apply within 21 days to the Tribunal for a confidential conference if there is a need to clarify these orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate