NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - External
CITATION: LA v Protective Commissioner & Ors [2004] NSWADTAP 39
APPELLANT LA FIRST REPONDENT Protective Commissioner PARTIES: SECOND RESPONDENT LB THIRD RESPONDENT LC FOURTH RESPONDENT & DECISION MAKER Guardianship Tribunal FILE NUMBER: 048007 HEARING DATES: 21/07/2004 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 07/21/2004 DATE OF DECISION: 09/08/2004
Guardianship Tribunal c/28616 Matter no. 2004/1517 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Hennessy N - Magistrate (Deputy President); Leal S - Judicial Member; Whaite A - Non Judicial Member CATCHWORDS: Expert evidence - weight to be given to - Financial management order - making - Procedural fairness MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: C/28616 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 04/01/2004 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Rules (Transitional) Regulation 1998 LEGISLATION CITED : Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 Evidence Act 1995 Guardianship Act 1987 Protected Estates Act 1983 Chen Zhen Zi v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 48 F RF 591 Collins Thomson Pty Ltd (in liq) v Clayton [2002] NSWSC 366 Durayappah v Fernando [1967] 2 AC 337 FGT Custodians Pty Ltd (Formerly Feingold Partners Pty Ltd) v Fagenblat [2003] VSCA 33 Gribbles Pathology (Vic) v Cassidy (2002) 122 FCR 78 Hopkins v Smethwick Board of Health (1890) 24 QBD 712 IF v IG & Ors [2004] NSWADTAP 3 J v Lieschke (1987) 69 ALR 647 CASES CITED: K v K [2000] NSWSC 1052 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Kirch Communications Pty Ltd v Gene Engineering Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 485 MAW v Western Sydney Area Health Service [2000] NSWSC 358 Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd v FCT (1963) 113 CLR 475 PRA v MA Supreme Court of Victoria Court of Appeal [4 March 2004] R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13 Re Gabriel [2001] NSWSC 905; W v G [2003] NSWSC 1170 Re Oscar [2002] NSWSC 453, Re Fernando APPELLANT In person FIRST RESPONDENT No appearance REPRESENTATION: SECOND RESPONDENT K Burke, barrister THIRD RESPONDENT In person FOURTH RESPONDENT & DECISION MAKER E Cho, Legal Officer ORDERS: The decision of the Guardianship Tribunal is affirmed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate