NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: Lloyd -v- Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (Inquiry 1: 'Chisel' - Findings) (GD) [2003] NSWADTAP 47 APPELLANT PARTIES: Ronald George Lloyd RESPONDENT Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee FILE NUMBER: 039026 HEARING DATES: 28/07/2003 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 07/28/2003 DATE OF DECISION: 10/13/2003
Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Ronald George Lloyd (Inquiry 1: 'Chisel' – Findings) [2003] NSWADT 95 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Goode P - Judicial Member; Stephens T - Member CATCHWORDS: bias - defence of honest and reasonable mistake - failure to consider - denial of natural justice - failure to provide access to evidence - error as to status of evidence - effect on creditability of another witness - failure of all Tribunal Members to participate in determination - professional misconduct - charges formulated after resolution as to a prima facie case - professional misconduct - conduct constituting professional misconduct - professional misconduct - duplicity or repetition within the allegations - professional misconduct - failure to give sufficient notification of substance of allegations - professional misconduct - insufficient investigation of complaint - professional misconduct - insufficient weight given to expert evidence - professional misconduct - no committee resolution as to prima facie case - reconsitution of tribunal - failure to recall witnesses MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 40004 of 1998 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 05/09/2003 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Veterinary Surgeons Act 1986 Veterinary Surgeons Regulation 1995 Brennan v Brennan (1953) 89 CLR 129 Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (Inquiry 4: 'Total Eclipse' – Jurisdiction) [2003] NSWADTAP 19 Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd (Inquiry 2: 'Gypsy' – Findings) [2003] NSWADT 96 CASES CITED: Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd (Inquiry 3: 'Remus' – Findings: Allegation 1(a) to (e)) [2002] NSWADT 285 Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd (Inquiry 3: 'Remus' – Findings: Allegation 2) [2003] NSWADT 136 Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd (Inquiry 4: 'Total Eclipse' – Jurisdiction) [2002] NSWADT 283 Veterinary Surgeon APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: M Tzannes, Barrister RESPONDENT L T Grey, Barrister ORDERS: 1 Appeal allowed in part; 2 Findings of misconduct in a professional respect set aside in relation to Allegation 1(a), Particulars, paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, and Allegations 1(b), 1(c) and 2; 3 Inquiry to be remitted to the Tribunal for consideration of what orders, if any, should be made under s 32(1) of the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1986 with respect to Allegation 1(a), Particulars, paragraph 4, and Allegation 1(e).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate