NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (Inquiry 3: 'Remus' - Allegations 1(a) to (e)) (GD) [2003] NSWADTAP [2003] NSWADTAP 45 APPELLANT PARTIES: Ronald George Lloyd RESPONDENT Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee FILE NUMBER: 039004 HEARING DATES: 6/05/2003, 28/07/2003 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 07/28/2003 DATE OF DECISION: 10/13/2003
Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Ronald George Lloyd (Inquiry 3: 'Remus' - Allegations 1(a) to (e)) [2002] NSWADT 285 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Goode P - Judicial Member; Stephens T - Member CATCHWORDS: bias - error as to status of evidence - effect on creditability of another witness - expert witness - objectivity of - failure of all Tribunal Members to participate in determination - professional misconduct - conduct constituting professional misconduct - professional misconduct - duplicity or repetition within the allegations - professional misconduct - fail to notify of all matters complained of - professional misconduct - insufficient investigation of complaint - professional misconduct - insufficient weight given to expert evidence - reconsitution of tribunal - failure to recall witnesses - reliance of admissions MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 40015 of 1998 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 12/31/2002 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Planning Appeals Board Act 1980 (Vic) LEGISLATION CITED : Poisons Act 1966 Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Regulation 1994 Veterinary Surgeons Act 1986 Veterinary Surgeons Regulation 1995 Barnard v National Dock Labour Board [1953] 2 QB 18 Bremner v Victorian Railways Commissioner (1902) 27 VLR 729 Brennan v Brennan (1953) 89 CLR 129 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Cotogno v Lamb (No. 2) (1985) 3 NSWLR 221 Gleeson v New South Wales Harness Racing Authority (1990) 21 ALD 515 Hopwood v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee [2003] NSWADT 44 Kalil v Bray [1977] 1 NSWLR 256 Lloyd, Re, Unreported, Veterinary Surgeons Disciplinary Tribunal, 16 December 1994 Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee [2002] NSWCA 224 Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (Inquiry 4: 'Total Eclipse' – Jurisdiction) [2003] NSWADTAP 19 Lovett v Chiropractors and Osteopaths Registration Board, Unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, 7 December 1993 Orr v Holmes (1948) 76 CLR 632 CASES CITED: Pettitt v South Australian Tattersall's Club [1930] SASR 258 Pillai v Messiter (No. 2) (1989) 16 NSWLR 197 Qidwai v Brown [1984] 1 NSWLR 100 R v Lewis (1988) 165 CLR 12 R v Planning Appeals Board, Ex parte Shoppingtown Motor Body Repairs Pty Ltd, Unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, 18 July 1985 Tu v University of Sydney [2003] NSWCA 170 Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd [2002] NSWADT 233 Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd (Inquiry 1: 'Chisel' – Findings) [2003] NSWADT 95 Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd (Inquiry 2: 'Gypsy' – Findings) [2003] NSWADT 96 Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd (Inquiry 3: 'Remus' – Findings: Allegation 2) [2003] NSWADT 136 Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd (Inquiry 4: 'Total Eclipse' – Jurisdiction) [2002] NSWADT 283 Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee v Lloyd (Inquiry 4: 'Total Eclipse' – Findings) [2002] NSWADT 284 Vine v National Dock Labour Board [1957] AC 488 Wentworth v Rogers (No. 3) (1985) 6 NSWLR 642 APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: M Tzannes, Barrister RESPONDENT L T Grey, Barrister ORDERS: 1 Appeal allowed in part; 2 Findings of misconduct in a professional sense in relation to Allegations 1(a) (part), 1(c), 1(d) and 1(e) affirmed, with variations, as set out in paragraphs 245 – 248 inclusive of this judgment; 3 Inquiry to be remitted to the Tribunal for consideration of what orders, if any, should be made under s 32(1) of the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1986 with respect to these findings; 4 Findings of misconduct in a professional sense in relation to Allegations 1(a) (except as specified in clause 2 of these Orders) and 1(b) set aside
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate