NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Vercoe -v- AMP Shopping Centres Pty Limited and Hardy [1999] NSWADT 89
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity
APPLICANT: Maureen Vercoe
RESPONDENT: AMP Shopping Centres Pty Limited (First Respondent) Ian Hardy (Second Respondent)
FILE NUMBER: 991052
HEARING DATES: 08/24/1999
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 08/24/1999
DATE OF DECISION: 17 September 1999
N Hennessy - Deputy President BEFORE: S Bullock - Member M Luger - Member
PRIMARY LEGISLATION: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977
APPLICATION: Sexual Harassment - Employment; Victimisation -
MATTER FOR DECISION: Application for security of costs
Applicant: J Woodward, solicitor, JJ Woodward & Co REPRESENTATION: Respondent: J Oakley of counsel instructed by Minter Ellison
ORDERS: 1. Notice of Motion dismissed. 2. No order as to costs.
Background 1 These proceedings concern a Notice of Motion filed with the Tribunal on 6 August 1999 seeking an order that the complainant provide security for the respondent's costs in the sum of $31,875.00 or such other amount as the Tribunal determines. 2 The applicant in relation to the Notice of Motion, AMP Shopping Pty Limited and Mr Hardy, are the respondents in proceedings before the Equal Opportunity Division of this Tribunal. The respondent to the Notice of Motion, Ms Vercoe, is the complainant in those proceedings. As this decision relates to the Notice of Motion, AMP Shopping Pty Limited and Mr Hardy will be referred to as the applicants and Ms Vercoe will be referred to as the respondent. 3 The respondent lodged a complaint of sexual harassment against the applicants with the Anti-Discrimination Board on 8 September 1998. The respondent alleged that Mr Hardy, an employee of AMP Shopping Pty Ltd, had sexually harassed her. A victimisation complaint was lodged on 20 October 1998 on the ground that her employment had been terminated because she had lodged a complaint. The President declined both complaints and the respondent subsequently exercised her right to have both matters referred to the Tribunal for hearing.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate