NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Kay (No. 2) -v- Commissioner, Department of Corrective Services [2000] NSWADT 67 DIVISION: General Division APPLICANT Michael Kay PARTIES: RESPONDENT Commissioner, Department of Corrective Services FILE NUMBER: 993177 HEARING DATES: 12 May 2000 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 05/31/2000 DATE OF DECISION: 05/31/2000
BEFORE: Hennessy N (Deputy President) APPLICATION: access to documents - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Freedom of Information Act 1989 Kay -v- Commissioner, Department of Corrective Services [2000] NSWADT 34 Mangoplah Pastoral Co Pty Ltd -v- Great Southern Energy [1999] NSWADT 93 Mathieson v Burton 1971 CLR 1 Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith (1991) 1 VR 63 Department of Premier and Cabinet v Hulls [1999] VSCA 117 CASES CITED: Pratt v Psychologists Registration Board of Victoria (1997/57928) (VCAT) Cowling v Dept of Human Services (1997/44102) (VCAT) Re Titelius and Ministry of Justice [1998] WAICmr 16 Waterford v The Commonwealth, (1987) 163 CLR 54 Louis James Carter v The Managing Partner, Northmore Hale Davy and Leake and Others (1995) 183 CLR 121 Esso Australia Resources Limited v The Commissioner of Taxation [1999] HCA 67 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: In person RESPONDENT N Yetzotis ORDERS: 1. The agency's decision not to disclose the documents in dispute is affirmed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate