NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Law Society of New South Wales v Terracciano [2005] NSWADT 86 DIVISION: Legal Services Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales RESPONDENT Mark Terracciano FILE NUMBER: 042002 HEARING DATES: 14/02/2005 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 02/14/2005 DATE OF DECISION: 04/15/2005
BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Brennan JWF - Judicial Member; Taksa L - Non Judicial Member APPLICATION: Professional Misconduct - breach of s. 61 of the Legal Profession Act - Professional Misconduct - fail to account - Professional Misconduct - misappropriate trust moneys/moneys MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Rules (Transitional) Regulation 1998 LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Practitioners Act 1898 Legal Profession Act 1987 Legal Profession Act 2004 Legal Profession Regulation 2002 A Solicitor v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2004] HCA 1 Dupal v Law Society of New South Wales, Unreported, 26 April 1990, Court of Appeal, NSW (BC9002508) Ex parte Lenehan (1948) 77 CLR 403 CASES CITED: Law Society of New South Wales v Foreman (1994) 34 NSWLR 408 Law Society of New South Wales v Goold [2001] NSWADT 171 Law Society of New South Wales v Moulton [1981] 2 NSWLR 736 Law Society of New South Wales v Witherdin [2004] NSWADT 237 Re Penfold (1998) 2 LPDR 19 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: D Barton, solicitor RESPONDENT In person ORDERS: 1. That the name of the Respondent be removed from the roll of legal practitioners; 2. That the Respondent pay the Applicant's costs of these proceedings, agreed at $2,500, by ten equal monthly instalments over a period of 10 months, with the first instalment to be paid one calendar month after the date of this decision.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate