NSW Caselaw
CITATION: HB and anor v Director General, Department of Community Services [2008] NSWADT 207
DIVISION: Community Services Division
APPLICANTS HB and HC PARTIES: RESPONDENT Director General, Department of Community Services
FILE NUMBER: 074036
HEARING DATES: 11-13 March 2008
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 28 July 2008
DATE OF DECISION: 29 July 2008
BEFORE: Britton A - Deputy President; Moss J - Non Judical Member; Goodman-Dulhunty J Dr - Non Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Revocation of care authorisation
MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1998 Community Services (Complaints, Reviews and Monitoring) Act 1993
CASES CITED: YG & GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 McDonald v Guardianship Administration Board [1993] 1 VR 521
APPLICANTS J McIntosh, barrister
REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT E Picker, barrister
SUBJECT CHILDREN K Rowley, solicitor
ORDERS: Affirm the respondent's decision to revoke the applicants' carer authorities.
Section 126 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 applies to this decision. Section 126 provides (1A) This section applies only to the following:
(a) proceedings in the Community Services Division of the Tribunal, (b) appeals to an Appeal Panel from a decision made by the Tribunal in the Community Services Division,
(b1) proceedings in relation to an external appeal made under section 67A of the Guardianship Act 1987 or section 21A of the Protected Estates Act 1983, (b2) proceedings in relation to a reviewable decision made under the Guardianship Act 1987 or the Protected Estates Act 1983 (c) such other proceedings (or class or classes of proceedings) as may be prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this section.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate