NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Cohen v Hargous; Karelicki v Hargous [2006] NSWADT 209
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
FIRST APPLICANT Anna Cohen SECOND APPLICANT PARTIES: Martin Cohen THIRD APPLICANT Alicia Karelicki RESPONDENT Martin Hargous
FILE NUMBER: 051138; 051136
HEARING DATES: 29 March 2006
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 04/26/2006
DATE OF DECISION: 07/20/2006
BEFORE: Britton A - Judicial Member; Weule B - Non Judicial Member; Gill M - Non Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Racial - Vilification
MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth)
Burns v Dye [2002] NSWADT 32 Veloskey & Anor -v- Karagiannakis & Ors (EOD) [2002] NSWADTAP 18 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Kazak (EOD) [2002] NSWADTAP 35 Burns v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd & Ors [2004] NSWADT 267 Collier v Sunol [2005] NSWADT 261 CASES CITED: A obo V and A -v- NSW Department of School Education (EOD) [2000] NSWADTAP 14 Mandla v Dowell Lee [1983] 2 AC 548 Khan v Commissioner, Department of Corrective Services & anor [2002] NSWADT 131 Toben v Jones (2003) 199 ALR 1 Jones v Scully (2002) 120 FCR 243 King Ansell v Police [1979] 2 NZLR 531
APPLICANTS In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT No appearance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate