NSW Caselaw
CITATION: International Enterprises Company Pty Limited v Kingsmede Pty Limited & Anor [2007] NSWADT 15
DIVISION: Retail Leases Division
APPLICANT/CROSS RESPONDENT International Enterprises Company Pty Limited PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT/CROSS APPLICANT Kingsmede Pty Limited SECOND RESPONDENT/CROSS APPLICANT Pamiers Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER: 065076, 065090
HEARING DATES: 14/08/2006- 16/08/2006 & 13/10/2006
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 13 October 2006
DATE OF DECISION: 11 January 2007
BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Griffiths G - (Advisory) Non Judicial Member ; Fagg N - (Advisory) Non Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Claim for payment of money - Unconscionability
MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Retail Leases Act 1994
Armstrong Jones Management Pty Ltd v Saies-Bond & Associates Pty Ltd [2006] NSWADT 323 Attorney General of New South Wales v World Best Holdings Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 557 CASES CITED: Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 64 Prsa & Anor v Polymeris [2000] NSDWADT 108 Shevill v Builders Licensing Board (1982) 149 CLR 620
APPLICANT/CROSS RESPONDENT G Mallory, agent REPRESENTATION: FIRST & SECOND RESPONDENTS/ CROSS APPLICANTS A Hourigan, barrister
ORDERS: 1. The Applicant/Cross Respondent is liable to pay the sum of $193, 926.97 to the Respondents/Cross Applicants.; 2. The Applicant/Cross Respondent's unconscionable conduct claim is dismissed.; 3. The Tribunal's interim order of 24 May 2006, prohibiting the Respondents/Cross Applicants from taking any steps to enforce the bank guarantee contained in the lease between them and the Applicant/Cross Respondent, is discharged.; 4. Any application for costs must be filed and served, with supporting submissions, within 28 days of the date of this decision. The opposing party or parties must file and serve submissions in reply within a further 28 days. Unless reasons are advanced for a hearing to be conducted, the matter will be resolved 'on the papers', pursuant to s 76 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate