NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Law Society of NSW v Mendigorin [2005] NSWADT 185 DIVISION: Legal Services Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales RESPONDENT Mario Mendigorin FILE NUMBER: 042027; 052004 HEARING DATES: 01/11/2004, 27/05/2005 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 06/09/2005 DATE OF DECISION: 08/09/2005
BEFORE: Clisdell RJ - Judicial Member; Riordan M - Judicial Member; Elliott K - Non Judicial Member APPLICATION: Professional Misconduct - breach of s. 61 of the Legal Profession Act - Professional Misconduct - breach of s. 62 of the Legal Profession Act - Professional Misconduct - fail to account - Professional Misconduct - fail to honour undertaking - Professional Misconduct - fail to keep client adequately advised - Professional Misconduct - misappropriate trust moneys/moneys - Professional Misconduct - mislead Court/Tribunal MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 Dawson v The Law Society of New South Wales, Court of Appeal 21.12.89 unreported CASES CITED: Law Society of NSW v Colin Walter Peck (Statutory Committee 23/04/1981) Law Society of NSW v Barry John Penfold (1998 – 4 LPDR 19) Law Society of NSW v Gould [2001] NSWADT 171 APPLICANT L Pierotti, solicitor REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT 01/11/2004 - M Dudhee, barrister 27/05/2005 - In person ORDERS: Orders made on 4 August 2005: 1. That the name of Mario Mendigorin be removed from the roll of legal practitioners; 2. That the Solicitor pays the costs of the Law Society as agreed or assessed; 3. That the Law Society have leave to file in the Tribunal an agreed quantum of costs for the purpose of enforcement; 4. Further leave to apply in respect of costs on seven days notice.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate