NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Tleyji v The TravelSpirit Group Pty Ltd [2005] NSWADT 294 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Pascale Tleyji RESPONDENT The TravelSpirit Group Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: 041118 HEARING DATES: 9/08/2005 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 08/09/2005 DATE OF DECISION: 12/15/2005
BEFORE: Britton A - Judicial Member; Lowe A - Non Judicial Member; Schneeweiss J - Non Judicial Member APPLICATION: Carers' Responsibility Discrimination - in work - Race Discrimination - In work - Sex Discrimination - In work MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Amery & Ors v State of New South Wales (Director-General NSW Department of Education and Training) [2004] NSWCA 404 Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd v Banovic & Ors (1989) 168 CLR 165 Bonella v Wollongong City Council [2001] NSWADT 194 Commissioner of Corrective Services v Aldridge [2000] NSWADTAP 5 Commonwealth Bank v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission ('Finance Sector Union Case') (1997) 150 ALR 1 Commonwealth v HREOC (1995) 63 FCR 74 Dutt v Central Coast Area Health Service [2002] NSWADT 133 Edwards v Bourke Shire Council [2005] NSWADT 9 CASES CITED: Gardiner v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (EOD) [2004] NSWADTAP 1 Hall v Sheiban (1985) ALR 503 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kumaran v Rail Infrastructure Corporation (EOD) [2005] NSWADTAP 41 Martin v McKensey (No. 2) [2003] NSWADT 126 Spencer v Greater Murray Area Health Service [2005] NSWADT 138 Styles v The Secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (1989) 23 FCR 251 The State of New South Wales v Amery & Ors (EOD) [2003] NSWADTAP 16 Waters v Public Transport Corporation (1991) 173 CLR 349 Wollongong City Council v Bonella & ors and Bonella & ors v Wollongong City Council (EOD) [2002] NSWADTAP 26 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: M Tibby, barrister RESPONDENT S Tan, solicitor ORDERS: 1. That part of the complaint of discrimination on the grounds of 'responsibilities as a carer' that relates to the Respondent's refusal to provide the Applicant part-time work in 2004 is substantiated and the balance of the complaint is dismissed; 2. The complaint of discrimination on the grounds of race is substantiated; 3. Respondent to pay the Applicant within 21 days damages in the sum of $5,000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate