Bradley -v- State of New South Wales (No.2) [2003] NSWADT 94

CITATION: Bradley -v- State of New South Wales (No.2) [2003] NSWADT 94 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division APPLICANT PARTIES: David Bradley RESPONDENT State of New South Wales (Attorney-General's Department) FILE NUMBER: 25 of 1998 HEARING DATES: 20/06/2002, 21/06/2002, 05/11/2002 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 01/02/2003 DATE OF DECISION: 05/07/2003

BEFORE: Hennessy N - Magistrate (Deputy President); Lau L - Member; Mooney L - Member APPLICATION: Disability Discrimination - Goods and Services MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Evidence Act 1995 Bradley -v- State of New South Wales [2002] NSWADT 11 Cody v JH Nelson Pty Ltd (1947) 74 CLR 629 Maunsell v Olins [1975] AC 373 Commissioner of Corrective Services -v- Aldridge (EOD) [2000] NSWADTAP 5 Bonella & ors -v- Wollongong City Council [2001] NSWADT 194 Wollongong City Council -v- Bonella & ors and Bonella & ors -v- Wollongong City Council (EOD) [2002] NSWADTAP 26 Scott & Anor v Telstra Corporation Limited (1995) EOC 92-717 Waters v Public Transport Corporation (1991) EOC 92-39057 Waters v Public Transport Corporation (1991) EOC 92 390 Price v The Civil Service Commission (1977) IRLR 291 The Australian Public Service Association v The Australian Trade Commission (1988) EOC 92-228 CASES CITED: Styles v The Secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade & Anor (1988) EOC 92-239 Speering v Minister of Education (1993) EOC 92-513 Byham v Preston City Council (1991) EOC 92-377 Beu v PR Exhibitions Pty Ltd [1997] QADT 13 Waters & Ors v Rizkalla & Anor (1990) EOC 92-282 Mills v Meeking (1990) 91 ALR 16 Wollongong City Council v Bonella [2002] NSWADTAP 26 Commonwealth Bank v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission ('Finance Sector Union Case') (1997) 150 ALR 1 Moxon v Westbus Ltd (No 1) [2000] NSWADTAP 12 Moxon v Westbus Ltd (No 2) [2002] NSWADTAP 24 March v Stramare (1991) 171 CLR 506 Alexander v Home Office [1998] 1 WLR 968 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: In person RESPONDENT C Ronalds, barrister ORDERS: 1. The complaint is substantiated; 2. The respondent is to pay the complainant damages in the sum of $6,379.00.