NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Patsalis v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police (No 2) [2004] NSWADT 185 DIVISION: General Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Michael Patsalis RESPONDENT Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police FILE NUMBER: 033041 HEARING DATES: 16/12/2003, 09/02/2004, 24/06/2004 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 06/24/2004 DATE OF DECISION: 08/27/2004
BEFORE: Britton A - Judicial Member APPLICATION: access to documents - personal affairs - access to documents - substantial and unreasonable diversion of agency's resources - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - personal affairs - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - substantial and unreasonable diversion of agency's resources MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Freedom of Information Act 1989 Beesley v Commissioner of Police [2000] NSWADT 52 CASES CITED: Patsalis v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2003] NSWADT 213 Patsalis v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service (GD) [2004] NSWADTAP 20 Re Smedley and Department of Business, the Arts, Sports and Tourism (1996) 41 ALD 779 APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT D Patterson (16 December 2003, 9 February 2004) P McLaughlin (24 June 2004) ORDERS: 1. The decision of the Repondent in respect of Item 3, Item 4 (as it relates to Mr Patsalis' phone records), Item 5, Item 6 (as it relates to the two boxes and the photographs), Item 7 and Item 8 is remitted.; 2. The decision of the Repondent in respect of Item 4 (as it relates to Exhibit AX) and Item 6 (except as it relates to the two boxes and the photographs) is affirmed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate