Lupevo Pty Limited & Ors -v- Bree (EOD) [2003] NSWADTAP 18

Appeal Panel - Internal

CITATION: Lupevo Pty Limited & Ors -v- Bree (EOD) [2003] NSWADTAP 18 APPELLANTS Lupevo Pty Limited t/a Ampol Nabiac PARTIES: David Clark Tonya Clark RESPONDENT Roxford Spencer Bree FILE NUMBER: 039018 HEARING DATES: 02/06/2003 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 06/02/2003 DATE OF DECISION: 06/18/2003

Bree v Lupevo Pty Limited & Ors [2003] NSWADT47 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Hennessy N - Magistrate (Deputy President); Innes G - Judicial Member; Nemeth de Bikal L - Member CATCHWORDS: costs - leave to appeal out of time MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 001051 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 03/11/2003 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Interpretation Act 1987 Legal Profession Act 1987 Bree v Lupevo Pty Limited & Ors [2003] NSWADT 47 Lupevo Pty Ltd t/a Ampol Nabiac -v- Bree [2002] NSWADTAP 9 Meschino and Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2001] AATA 342 Re Schmack and Defence Force Retirement and Death Benefits Authority (1981) 3 ALN N77 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 Goldie and Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] AATA 513 CASES CITED: Maric v Comcare (1993) 40 FCR 244 Comcare v A'Hearn (1993) 45 FCR 441 Janiak v Ippolito [1985] 1 SCR 146 Munce v Vinidex [1974] 2 NSWLR 235 (CA) Najdovska & Ors v Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd (1986) EOC 92 176 Cardozo v Centreline Service Systems Pty Ltd (1995) EOC 92-759 Tu -v- University of Sydney (No. 2) (EOD) [2002] NSWADTAP 25 APPELLANTS REPRESENTATION: R Pepper, barrister RESPONDENT D Fryatt, solicitor ORDERS: 1. The application to extend time for lodging the appeal is refused.; 2. The appeal is dismissed.; 3. The appellants are to pay the respondent's costs of this appeal as agreed or, if not agreed within 21 days, as assessed on the basis set out in Division 6 of Part 11 of the Legal Profession Act 1987.