NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel
CITATION: Moxon -v- Westbus Pty Limited (EOD) [2000] NSWADTAP 12 APPELLANT John Moxon PARTIES: RESPONDENT Westbus Pty Limited FILE NUMBER: 999027 HEARING DATES: 20/04/2000 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 04/20/2000 DATE OF DECISION: 07/25/2000
Principal matter DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Hennessy N (Deputy President); Rice S - Judicial Member; Bullock S - Member CATCHWORDS: adequacy of reasons - no evidence - relevant/irrelevant considerations - statutory interpretation MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 981001 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 09/21/1999 LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Francey & Meeuwissen v Hilton Hotels of Australia Pty Ltd (1977) EOC 92-903 Cooper v Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission [1999] FCA 180 Scott and Disabled Peoples International v Telstra Corporation Limited (1995) EOC Francey & Ors v Hilton Hotels of Australia Ltd [1997] HREOCA 56 Scott and Bernadette Finney v The Hills Grammar School [1999] HREOCA 14 Hills Grammar School v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [2000] FCA 65 Rees v Australian Agency for International Development [1999] HREOCA 12 Druett v State of New South Wales Dennis Willcox Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 79 ALR 267 Sullivan v. Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323 CASES CITED: Pettitt v. Dunkley (1971) 1 NSWLR 376 The Queen v Toohey; Ex parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd (1982) 158 CLR Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd & Ors v National Health & Medical Research Council & Ors (1996) 71 FCR Department of Defence v Jodette Margaret Fox [1997] 3 FCA Absolon v NSW TAFE [1999] NSWCA 311 Public Service Board of New South Wales v. Osmond (1985-1986) 159 CLR Soulemezis v. Dudley (Holdings) Pty. Limited (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 R. v. Associated Northern Collieries (1910) 11 CLR 738 Repatriation Commission v. O'Brien (1984-1985) 155 CLR Repatriation Commission v Norman Kenneth Boyle [1997] 1269 FCA Haswell v Department of School Education [1999] NSWSC 1271 Waters v Public Transport Corporation 1991 EOC APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: J Griffiths, barrister RESPONDENT C Ronalds, barrister ORDERS: 1. The appeal is upheld ; 2. The decision of the Tribunal made on 21 September 1999, that Westbus has made out the defence of unjustifiable hardship under s 49M(2) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977, is set aside ; 3. This aspect of the case is remitted to be heard and decided again by the Tribunal as originally or similarly constituted ; 4. No order as to costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate