NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Ciesielski -v- Broadway Shopping Centre Sydney Pty Ltd [2000] NSWADT 25 DIVISION: Retail Leases Division APPLICANT Carolyn Ciesielski PARTIES: RESPONDENT Broadway Shopping Centre Sydney Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: 995010 HEARING DATES: 08/03/00 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 03/08/2000 DATE OF DECISION: 03/17/2000
BEFORE: Hennessy N (Deputy President) APPLICATION: Evidence - relevance - Privilege - legal professional privilege - Privilege - without prejudice privilege MATTER FOR DECISION: Application by respondent not to produce documents on the grounds of privilege and relevance LEGISLATION CITED : Retail Leases Act 1994 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v The Commissioner of Taxation [1999] HCA 67 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501, 522 ACCC v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd (1998) 81FCR 526 CASES CITED: Nichmar Pty Ltd v Preservatrice Skandia Insurance Ltd (1985) 3 NSWLR 44 Lawrenson v Wellington City Corp [1927] NZLR 510 Biala Pty Ltd v Mallina Holdings Ltd [1990] WAR 174 National Employers' Mutual General Association Ltd v Waind and Hill [1978] NSWLR 372 REPRESENTATION: R Horsley, barrister M White, barrister ORDERS: 1. The respondent's claim for legal professional privilege is upheld in relation to Documents 7 - 11.; 2. The respondent's claim for without prejudice privilege is upheld in relation to Documents 14 - 25.; 3. All other documents not produced to the applicant in response to the Notice to Produce should be produced.; 4. No order as to costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate