NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: Armstrong Jones Management Pty Ltd v Saies-Bond & Associates Pty Ltd (RLD) [2007] NSWADTAP 47
APPELLANT PARTIES: Armstrong Jones Management Pty Ltd RESPONDENT Saies-Bond & Associates Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER: 069075
HEARING DATES: 26 and 27 March 2007
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 27 March 2007
DATE OF DECISION: 6 September 2007
BEFORE: O'Connor K - DCJ (President); Molloy GB - Judicial Member; O'Neill A - Non Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Retail Leases - Termination of Lease for Non-Payment - Pre-Lease Misrepresentation - Interpretation of section 10 - Authority - Reliance - Omission of Representation for Pre-Lease Disclosure Statement - Interpretation of section 11 - Estoppel - Unconscionable Conduct - Scope of Relief - Mitigation of Damages - Retail Leases Act 1994, ss 10, 11, 62B, 72.
MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter
FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 055169, 065015
DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 11/13/2006
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Retail Leases Act 1994 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Armstrong Jones Management Pty Ltd v Saies-Bond & Associates Pty Ltd [2006] NSWADT 323 Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (2005) 64 NSWLR 245 Lamson Store Service Co Ltd v Russell Wilkins & Son Ltd (1906) 4 CLR 672 Progressive Mailing House Pty Ltd v Tabali Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 17 Trust Company of Australia Ltd (Stockland Property Management Ltd) v Skiwing Pty Ltd trading as Café Tiffany's [2005] NSWADTAP 9 Trust Company of Australia Limited (trading as Stockland Property Management) v Skiwing Pty Ltd (trading as Café Tiffany's) [2006] NSWCA 185; 66 NSWLR 77 Holmes v Jones (1907) 4 CLR 1692 Golden Harvest (Australia) P/L v Paing P/L & ors [2002] NSWADTAP 40 Golden Harvest (Aust) P/L v Paing P/L & ors [2004] NSWCA 85 McKeand v Thomas [2006] NSWSC 1028 Bruce Harvey and Anor v State of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 1436 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Bruce v Cole (1998) 45 NSWLR 163 CASES CITED: Vetter v Lake Macquarie City Council (2001) 202 CLR 439 Potts v Miller (1940) 64 CLR 282 Gould v Vaggelas (1984) 157 CLR 215 Smith v. Chadwick (1884) 9 App Cas 187 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Rogers v Wentworth (1986) 7 NSWLR 88 Xin v Zakos [2002] NSWADT 189 FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v RAIA Insurance Brokers Ltd (1992) 108 ALR 479 Samaha & Anor v Corbett Court Pty Ltd; Corbett Court Pty Ltd v Samaha & Anor [2006] NSWSC 1441 Attorney General of New South Wales v World Best Holdings Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 557 Toteff v Antonas (1952) 87 CLR 647 Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd [1998] HCA 69, (1998) 196 CLR 494 Karacominakis v Big Country Developments Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 313 O'Neill v Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd (2002) 122 FCR 455
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate