NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Nam & anor -v- Commonwealth Funds Management Limited & anor [2002] NSWADT 80 revised - 16/05/2002 DIVISION: Retail Leases Division APPLICANTS Ki Sung Nam Moon Hwi Nam PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT Commonwealth Funds Management Limited SECOND RESPONDENT Mirvac Funds Limited FILE NUMBER: 025043 HEARING DATES: 30/04/2002, 01/05/2002, 08/05/2002 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 05/08/2002 DATE OF DECISION: 05/15/2002
BEFORE: O'Connor K - DCJ (President); Griffiths G - Member APPLICATION: Interim order MATTER FOR DECISION: Preliminary matter LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Retail Leases Act 1994 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618 Townsend v Chief Executive, State Rail Authority [1999] NSWADT 56 CASES CITED: Dein v Bailey [1960] NSWR 385; Szentessy v Woo Ran (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 1) (1985) 64 ACTR 98 Allen & ors v Jambo Holdings Ltd & ors [1980] 2 All ER 502 Commercial Bank of South Australia v Insurance Brokers Association of Australia (1977) 16 ALR 161 Ross v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1987) 70 LGRA 91 APPLICANTS REPRESENTATION: A Tonking, barrister RESPONDENTS C Hodgson, barrister ORDERS: 1) That orders be made reflecting the conclusions of the Tribunal as set out in paras 100, 101, 107 and 108 of the reasons for decision; 2) The parties are requested within two days to prepare minutes of the orders for endorsement by the Tribunal; 3) The matter be relisted for urgent directions when requested by either party.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate