NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: Petria Pty Ltd v Makhoul [2005] NSWADTAP 12 APPELLANT PARTIES: Petria Pty Ltd RESPONDENT Edward Makhoul FILE NUMBER: 049015 HEARING DATES: On the papers SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 02/11/2005 DATE OF DECISION: 03/21/2005
Makhoul v Petria Pty Ltd [2004] NSWADT 51 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Boyce P - Judicial Member; Weule B - Non Judicial Member CATCHWORDS: costs MATTER FOR DECISION: Costs FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 035146 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 03/10/2004 LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Retail Leases Act 1994 Citadin Pty Ltd (No 2) v Eddie Azzi Australia Pty Ltd & General Pants Co Pty Ltd (RLD) [2001] NSWADTAP 31 Commissioner of Police v Mooney (No 3) (EOD) [2004] NSWADTAP 22 Gizah Pty Ltd v AXA Trustees Ltd (No 2) [2001] NSWADT 164 CASES CITED: Irresistible Frocks Salon Pty Ltd v Sparbac Pty Ltd and Roche Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] NSWADT 72 Makhoul v Petria Pty Limited [2004] NSWADT 51 Petria Pty Limited v Makhoul [2004] NSWADTAP 47 Tu v University of Sydney (No 2) (EOD) [2002] NSWADTAP 25 APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: D L Warren, barrister RESPONDENT T Hall, barrister ORDERS: 1. This application by the Appellant for the costs of the appeal is dismissed; 2. No order on the costs of this application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate