Z (No. 3) -v- University of A [2001] NSWADT 182

CITATION: Z (No. 3) -v- University of A [2001] NSWADT 182 revised - 16/04/2002 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Z RESPONDENT University of A FILE NUMBER: 001001 HEARING DATES: 23/06/2000, 4/08/2000, 8/09/2000, 13/10/2000, 26/02/2001 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 03/15/2001 DATE OF DECISION: 11/08/2001

BEFORE: Goode P - Judicial Member; Clayton S - Member; McDonald O - Member APPLICATION: Joinder of parties MATTER FOR DECISION: Preliminary matter LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Z v University of A (No. 2) [2001] NSWADT 138 Hughes v Bowral Co-operative Trading Ltd & Ors [1997] NSWEOT 300 Borg v Commissioner Department of Corrective Services [2000] NSWADT 118 Crook v Department of Education and Training (1998) NSWEOT, 12 August 1997 Elmaraazey v University of NSW & Ors [1996] HREOCA 17 Jameson v FAI General Insurance Co Ltd 8 June 2000 Lal v President, Anti-Discrimination Board of New South Wales [2000] NSWADT 68 Crewdson v President, Anti-Discrimination Board of New South Wales [2000] NSWADT 60 CASES CITED: Atkins & Ors v Director General of Education (1989) EOC 92-263 Reyes Gonzalez v Sydney Institute of Technology [1998] NSWEOT 4 Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service v Orr [2001] NSWADTAP 16 Ravel v Plastral Fidence Pty Ltd [1999] NSWADT 18 Prakash v Bobb Borg Enterprises Pty Ltd [1999] NSWADT 73 Tredinnick v Wentworth Area Health Service [2000] NSWADT 172) Bogie v The University of Western Sydney (1990) EOC 92-313 Shaikh v Commission, NSW Fire Brigade (1966) EOC 92-808 R v Marinkovic and Marinkovic (1986) EOC 92-841 Western Aboriginal Legal Services Ltd v Jones & Anor (2000) NSWADT 102 Wheeler v Shellharbour Golf Club Limited [1995] NSWEOT 85 APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT K Grime, solicitor JOINDER PARTIES K Grime, solicitor ORDERS: 1. The following persons not be joined as respondents to the proceedings: Professor E, C, Professor G, Professor J, Professor H, Professor I; 2. Dr D be joined as a respondent to the proceedings but only in response to the Applicant's claims of:imputed homosexual discrimination, victimisation, imputed homosexual vilification; 3. That B be joined as a respondent to the proceedings but only in response to the Applicant's claims of victimisation.