NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Law Society of New South Wales -v- Sullivan [2000] NSWADT 167 DIVISION: Legal Services Division APPLICANT Council of the Law Society of New South Wales PARTIES: RESPONDENT Timothy Matthew Sullivan FILE NUMBER: 992027 22/03/2000 19/04/2000 HEARING DATES: 27/04/2000 08/05/2000 30/10/2000 17/11/2000 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 11/17/2000 DATE OF DECISION: 11/17/2000
BEFORE: Coombs J QC - Judicial Member; Durbach A - Judicial Member; Klika D - Member APPLICATION: Professional Misconduct - act without instructions - Professional Misconduct - breach of s. 61 of the Legal Profession Act - Professional Misconduct - fail to comply with s. 152 Notice - Professional Misconduct - fail to keep client adequately advised - Professional Misconduct - hinder investigation - Professional Misconduct - hold out to be a Solicitor/Barrister without being the holder of a practising certificate - Professional Misconduct - misappropriate trust moneys/moneys - Professional Misconduct - mislead Court/Tribunal - Professional Misconduct - mislead Law Society/Bar Association/LSC - Professional Misconduct - practice as a Solicitor/Barrister without a practising certificate - Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct - delay - Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct - fail to keep client adequately advised MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 Walsh v The Law Society of NSW 73 ALJR 1138 Barwick v Law Society of NSW 74 ALJR 419 The Society v Foreman, (1994) 34 NSWLR 408 The Society v Moulton (1981) 2 NSWLR 736 CASES CITED: Prothonotary v Ritchard (C/A unreported, 31/07/1987) Jauncey v The Society (C/A unreported, 01/02/1989) The Society v McNamara (unreported 07/03/1980) In re a Practitioner (1984) 36 SASR 590 Vegehlyi v The Society (C/A unreported, 06/10/1995) APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: P Boyd, solicitor RESPONDENT B Caffrey, solicitor ORDERS: 1. That the name of Timothy Matthew Sullivan be removed from the Roll of Legal Practitioners of the Supreme Court of New South Wales; 2. That the Respondent pay the costs of the Applicant as agreed or assessed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate