NSW Caselaw
CITATION: BY -v- Director General, Attorney General's Department (No. 2) [2003] NSWADT 37 DIVISION: General Division APPLICANT PARTIES: BY RESPONDENT Director General, Attorney Generals Department FILE NUMBER: 013087 and 013088 HEARING DATES: 19/09/2002 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 10/16/2002 DATE OF DECISION: 02/28/2003
BEFORE: O'Connor K - DCJ (President) APPLICATION: access to documents - confidential material - access to documents - law enforcement & public safety - access to documents - personal affairs - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - confidential material - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - law enforcement & public safety - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - personal affairs MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic) LEGISLATION CITED : Freedom of Information Act 1989 Legal Practitioners Admission Rules 1994 Legal Profession Act 1987 BY v Director General, Attorney General's Department [2002] NSWADT 79 Mauger v General Manager, Wingecaribbee Shire Council [1999] NSWADT 35 Accident Compensation Commission v Croom [1991] 2 VR 322 Re Gold and Australian Federal Police and National Crime Authority (1994) 37 ALD 168 CASES CITED: Watkins v Chief Executive, Road Traffic Authority [2000] NSWADT 11 Cain v Glass (no 2) (1985) 3 NSWLR 230 Greater Manchester Police v McNally [2002] EWCACiv 14 Australian Securities and Investment Commission [ASIC] v Whitlam [2002] NSWSC 526 Neary v The Treasurer, New South Wales [2002] NSWADT 261 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: In person RESPONDENT P Singleton, barrister ORDERS: 1. The determination of the agency to refuse to grant access to the eight documents listed in the schedule dated 20 Septembere 2002 is affirmed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate