Kumaran v Rail Infrastructure Corporation & Anor [2005] NSWADT 30

CITATION: Kumaran v Rail Infrastructure Corporation & Anor [2005] NSWADT 30 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division APPLICANT Indra Kumaran PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT Rail Infrastructure Corporation SECOND RESPONDENT Laughlin Executives Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: 031116 & 031117 HEARING DATES: 20/05/2004-21/05/2004, 20/08/2004 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 08/20/2004 DATE OF DECISION: 02/21/2005

BEFORE: Rice S - Judicial Member; Gill M - Non Judicial Member; O'Sullivan M - Non Judicial Member APPLICATION: Race Discrimination - In work - Victimisation MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Amery & ors v State of New South Wales (Director-General NSW Department of Education And Training [2004] NSWCA 404 Australian Medical Council v Wilson (1996) 68 FCR 46 Commissioner of Police v The Estate of Edward John Russell & Ors (2002) 55 NSWLR 232 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service v Estate Edward John Russell & ors. [2001] NSWSC 745 Dutt -v- Central Coast Area Health Service [2002] NSWADT 133 CASES CITED: Feletti v Kontoulas [2000] NSWCA 59 Fraoucene v Caruana t/as GAC Property Management Services [2005] NSWADT 1 French v Gosford City Council [2003] NSWADT 273 Li & Anor -v- Westbus Pty Ltd & Anor [2002] NSWADT 260 Malec v J.C. Hutton Pty. Ltd. (1990) 169 CLR 638 Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum N.L. and Others (1994) 179 CLR 332 Wollongong City Council -v- Bonella & ors and Bonella & ors -v- Wollongong City Council (EOD) [2002] NSWADTAP 26 APPLICANT In person REPRESENTATION: FIRST RESPONDENT R Banks, solicitor & A Woods,solicitor SECOND RESPONDENT R Keller ORDERS: 1. That the first respondent pay to the Applicant the sum of $2,000 as compensation for loss and damage.; 2. That the complaint against the second respondent be dismissed.; 3. The victimisation complaint against the first respondent is dismissed.; 4. That each party shall pay their own costs.