NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Fares & ors v Bleakley & anor [2006] NSWADT 53
DIVISION: Retail Leases Division
APPLICANTS Ghassan Fares Jittmia Chawalittara Kektanok Roongsawang Jutarpon Channoom RESPONDENTS Robert John Bleakley PARTIES: Shala Pty Limited CROSS APPLICANTS Robert John Bleakley Shala Pty Limited CROSS RESPONDENTS Ghassan Fares Jittmia Chawalittara Kektanok Roongsawang Jutarpon Channoom
FILE NUMBER: 035135; 045036
HEARING DATES: On the papers
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 11/16/2005
DATE OF DECISION: 02/21/2006
BEFORE: Boyce P - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Costs
MATTER FOR DECISION: Costs
LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Retail Leases Act 1994
Alessa v Total and Universal Pty Limited [2001] NSW ADT 150 at [4-6] CASES CITED: Alessa v Total and Universal Pty Limited [2001] NSW ADT 150 at [4-6] Citadin Pty Limited v Eddie Azzi Australia Pty Ltd & Anor (No2) [2001] NSW ATAP 31Forma v BHP Co. Ltd [1999] NSW ADT 59G&M Dawson Pty Limited -v- Cripps & Ors (No.3)(RLD)[2005] NSW ADTAP 24Gizah Pty Limited v Axa Trustees Limited (No 2) [2001] NSW ADT 164 at [29]Hoblos v Marchese [1999] NSW ADT 127)Holpitt Pty Ltd v Varimu Pty Ltd (1991) 103 ALR 684Langley v UNSW (1984) EOC 92-018 at 75 468Trust Company of Australia Limited v Craig and Ors [2005] NSWADT 65 at [44]Wood and Anor v Bergman (No.2) [2003] NSWADT 175 at [11]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate