NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Judge v Cripps & Cripps Pty Limited [1999] NSWADT 11
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity
APPLICANT: Robyn Judge
RESPONDENT: Cripps & Cripps Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER: 47 of 1998
HEARING DATES: 02/25/1999; 02/26/1999; 03/04/1999
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 02/26/1999
DATE OF DECISION: 4 March 1999
Graham Ireland - Judicial Member BEFORE: S Clayton - Member A Silva - Member
PRIMARY LEGISLATION: Anti Discrimination Act 1977
APPLICATION: -
MATTER FOR DECISION: Primary matter
Applicant: P Sekhon, NSW Clerical & Administrative Branch, Australian Services Union REPRESENTATION: Respondent: J Needham instructed by Sanders Simpson & Freed Solicitors
(1) That the claim of sex discrimination against the respondent has not been substantiated and is dismissed.
ORDERS: (2) That the claim of victimisation against the respondent has not been substantiated and is dismissed.
(3) That there be no order as to costs.
CHAIRMAN: General Background 1 I can state that the Tribunal has reached a decision. At this stage the terms of that decision have not been reduced to writing, so I will need to read the decision from my notes, and the transcript will record those details. The parties will have access to that transcript when it is available.
2 This is an inquiry that results from a reference to the Tribunal by the President of the Anti-Discrimination Board under section 94(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 N S W, "the Act". That reference was made to the Tribunal on 22 April 1998 on the ground of sex in employment and victimisation.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate