NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: Sotiropoulos -v- Mattana Coiffure Pty Limited (No 2) (RLD) [2004] NSWADTAP 43 APPELLANT PARTIES: Vlasios Vasilios Sotiropoulos RESPONDENT Mattana Coiffure Pty Limited FILE NUMBER: 049018 HEARING DATES: 30/08/2004 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 08/30/2004 DATE OF DECISION: 10/06/2004
Mattana Coiffure Pty Limited -v- Sotiropoulos [2004] NSWADT 80 DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Molloy GB - Judicial Member; O'Neill A - Non Judicial Member CATCHWORDS: costs MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 035024 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 04/23/2004 LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Retail Leases Act 1994 Alessa Pty Ltd v Total & Universal Pty Ltd [2001] NSWADT 150 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Gizah Pty Ltd v AXA Trustees Ltd (No. 2) [2001] NSWADT 164 CASES CITED: Irresistible Frocks Salon Pty Ltd v Sparbac Pty Ltd and Roche Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] NSWADT 72 Mattana Coiffure Pty Limited v Sotiropoulos [2003] NSWADT 210 Mattana Coiffure Pty Limited v Sotiropoulos (No 2) [2004] NSWADT 80 Randi Wiks Pty Ltd v Pokana Pty Ltd [2003] NSWADTAP 27 Wood & Anor v Bergman (No 2) [2003] NSWADT 175 APPELLANT REPRESENTATION: M Elliott, Barrister RESPONDENT M Darke, Barrister ORDERS: 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Order No. 11 in the Tribunal's decision of 23 April 2004 set aside.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate