NSW Caselaw
CITATION: SL v Minister for Community Services [2005] NSWADT 228 DIVISION: Community Services Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Mr & Mrs SL RESPONDENT Minister for Community Services FILE NUMBER: 054022 HEARING DATES: 02/06/2005, 11, 12 & 19/08/2005 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 09/10/2005 DATE OF DECISION: 10/07/2005
BEFORE: Britton A - Judicial Member; Smyth M - Judicial Member; Moss J - Non Judical Member APPLICATION: Removal of children from authorised carer MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 Community Services (Complaints, Reviews and Monitoring) Act 1993 CASES CITED: McDonald v Guardianship Administration Board [1993] 1 VR 521 YG & GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: H Ginges, solicitor RESPONDENT E Robertson, solicitor ORDERS: The decision to remove the children who are the subject of this application is affirmed.
Section 126 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 applies to this decision. Section 126 provides (1A) This section applies only to the following: (a) proceedings in the Community Services Division of the Tribunal, (b) appeals to an Appeal Panel from a decision made by the Tribunal in the Community Services Division, (b1) proceedings in relation to an external appeal made under section 67A of the Guardianship Act 1987 or section 21A of the Protected Estates Act 1983, (b2) proceedings in relation to a reviewable decision made under the Guardianship Act 1987 or the Protected Estates Act 1983 (c) such other proceedings (or class or classes of proceedings) as may be prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this section.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate