NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Nawi No 3 Pty Ltd & Ors v ING Management Ltd [2005] NSWADT 235 DIVISION: Retail Leases Division APPLICANTS Nawi No 3 Pty Ltd PARTIES: Britehurst Pty Ltd JEA Services Pty Ltd RESPONDENT ING Management Ltd FILE NUMBER: 055030 HEARING DATES: 28/07/2005 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 07/28/2005 DATE OF DECISION: 10/17/2005
BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Fagg N - Non Judicial Member ; Griffiths G - Non Judicial Member APPLICATION: Claim for relief from payment of money - Damages - Unconscionability MATTER FOR DECISION: Costs LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Retail Leases Act 1994 Citadin Pty Ltd (No 2) v Eddie Azzi Australia Pty Ltd & General Pants Pty Ltd (RLD) [2001] NSWADTAP 31 Gizah Pty Ltd v AXA Trustees Ltd (No. 2) [2001] NSWADT 164 Lau v Westfield Ltd (Westfield Eastgardens) [2005] NSWADT 165 CASES CITED: Protogeros v Fouzas [2004] NSWADT 62 Sarip Investment Pty Ltd v Uno Uno Pty Ltd [2004] NSWADT 27 Sotiropoulos v Mattana Coiffure Pty Ltd (No 2) (RLD) [2004] NSWADTAP 43 World Best Holdings Ltd v Sarker [2004] NSWSC 1164 Yee Kwong Wah Pty Ltd v Hawach & Anor [2003] NSWADT 151 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: J Atkinson, agent RESPONDENT M Yun, solicitor ORDERS: The Applicants are to pay the costs incurred by the Respondent in these proceedings in the Tribunal, as assessed or agreed on a party-party basis, up to and including the costs of the hearing of 20 May 2005 and including the costs reserved at the hearing of 9 March 2005.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate