NSW Caselaw
Set aside by Appeal : Set Aside by Appeal on 8/12/06: University of New South Wales v Gerard Michael McGuirk [2006] NSWSC 1362
CITATION: McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2005] NSWADT 113 DIVISION: General Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Gerard Michael McGuirk RESPONDENT University of New South Wales FILE NUMBER: 043295, 043398 HEARING DATES: 13/04/2005-14/04/2005 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 05/14/2005 DATE OF DECISION: 05/23/2005
BEFORE: Montgomery S - Judicial Member APPLICATION: access to documents - confidential material - access to documents - personal affairs - access to documents - protected disclosures - access to documents - substantial and unreasonable diversion of agency's resources - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - confidential material - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - personal affairs - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - protected disclosures - Freedom of Information Act - access to documents - substantial and unreasonable diversion of agency's resources MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Freedom of Information Act 1989 Protected Disclosures Act 1994 Chief Executive Officer, State Rail Authority v Woods [GD) [2003] NSWADTAP 25 Commissioner of Police -v- District Court of NSW (1993) 31 NSWLR CASES CITED: Electoral Commissioner, State Electoral Office v McCabe (GD) [2003] NSW ADTAP 28 Robinson -v- Director General, Department of Health [2002] NSWADT 222 Young v Wicks (1986) 13 FCR APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: In person RESPONDENT A Mullen, solicitor ORDERS: 1. The reviewable decisions are set aside; 2. The applicant is to be given a copy of each of those documents that fall within the scope of the applications. It is sufficient satisfaction of this order if the documents are provided in a printable electronic form; 3. Of the documents sought, the material identified in Schedule 1 to these reasons falls outside the scope of the application; 4. These matters are to be listed for further directions in relation to the issue of whether a report under Section 58 of the FOI Act ought to be made.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate