NSW Caselaw
CITATION: NSW Architects Registration Board v Cserhalmi (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 282
DIVISION: General Division
APPLICANT PARTIES: NSW Architects Registration Board RESPONDENT Otto Cserhalmi
FILE NUMBER: 053399
HEARING DATES: On the papers
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 08/28/2006
DATE OF DECISION: 09/27/2006
BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President)
CATCHWORDS: Architect - disciplinary finding - professional misconduct - Architect - disciplinary finding - unsatisfactory professional conduct - Architects Act - Architect - disciplinary finding - unsatisfactory professional conduct - Architects Act - Architect - discriplinary finding - professional misconduct
MATTER FOR DECISION: Costs
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 LEGISLATION CITED : Architects Act 1921 Architects Act 2003 Retail Leases Act 1994
Brooks Maher v Cheung [2001] NSWADT 18 Cripps v G & M Dawson Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 81 CASES CITED: Doyle v Registrar, NSW Architects Registration Board (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 251 NSW Architects Registration Board v Cserhalmi [2006] NSWADT 110 PC v University of New South Wales (No 2) [2005] NSWADT 264 Townsend v Chief Executive, State Rail Authority [1999] NSWADT 104
APPLICANT P Griffin, barrister REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT M Davies, solicitor
ORDERS: The Respondent's application for the costs of these proceedings is dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate