NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Dixon -v- RNJ Sicame Pty Ltd & anor; Sims -v- RNJ Sicame Pty Ltd & anor [2002] NSWADT 154 revised - 11-Sep-2002 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division 1. APPLICANT Elsie Dixon 1. RESPONDENT RNJ Sicame Pty Ltd 2. RESPONDENT PARTIES: John Knox 2. APPLICANT Jocelyn Sims 1. RESPONDENT RNJ Sicame Pty Ltd 2. RESPONDENT John Knox FILE NUMBER: 011076; 011078 HEARING DATES: 05/03/02 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 04/03/2002 DATE OF DECISION: 08/30/2002
BEFORE: Britton A - Judicial Member; Taksa L - Member; Weule B - Member APPLICATION: Joinder of parties MATTER FOR DECISION: Preliminary decision Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 LEGISLATION CITED : Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Australian Doctors Trained Overseas Association Inc v Director General, NSW Department of Health [2000] NSWADT 115 Bonnella v Wollongong City Council [2001] NSWADT 194 Bignell v NSW Casino Control Authority [2001] NSWADTAP 41 Z (No. 2) v University of A [2001] NSWADT 138 Z (No. 3) v University of A [2001] NSWADT 182 Allan v Transurban City Link Ltd [2001] HCA 58 CASES CITED: Gregor v State of Victoria [2000] VCAT 414 Cooper v Human Rights Commission [1999] FCA 180 Adelaide City Corporation v Australasian Performing Rights Association Ltd (1928) 40 CLR 481 Elliott v Nanda & Commonwealth [2001] FCA 418 Young v Australian Workers' Union (1974) 5 ALR 347 Djokic v Sinclair & Central Queensland Meat Export Company (Aust) Pty Limited (1994) EOC T92-643 Horne & Anor v Press Clough Joint Venture & Anor (1994) EOC T92-556 APPLICANTS REPRESENTATION: S Ryan, solicitor RESPONDENTS C Ronalds, barrister ORDERS: 1. Applications to join the Automotive, Food, Metal, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union, NSW Branch, Sandra Zuliani and Martin Cartwright to proceedings 011076 and 011078 are refused.; 2. Application for costs to be determined at the conclusion of the proceedings.; 3. The applicants to file and serve Points of Claim, and any evidence on which they seek to rely within 28 days of the date of this decision.; 4. The respondents to file and serve Points of Defence, and any evidence on which they seek to rely within 28 days of receiving the documents referred to in Order 3.; 5. The applicants to file and serve any evidence in reply within 14 days of receipt of the documents referred to in Order 4.; 6. The matters to be set down for a case conference for the allocation of hearing dates at a date to be fixed by the Registrar.; 7. The parties be granted leave to restore this matter for further directions and/or orders upon 7 days notice.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate